Is ‘Quiet Quitting’ Just Setting Boundaries in Disguise?
The Rise of “Quiet Quitting”: A New Name for an Old Struggle?
The internet is buzzing with talk of “quiet quitting,” a workplace trend sparking countless articles, social media debates, and think pieces. But is it truly a new phenomenon, or a trendy label on an age-old struggle between employees and employers?
Decoding the Buzzword: What Exactly IS “Quiet Quitting”?
“Quiet quitting” refers to fulfilling your job description without going above and beyond, opting out of the hustle culture pervasive in many industries. Think: no late nights, no checking emails on weekends, and no volunteering for extra projects.
While the phrase might be new, the sentiment isn’t. For decades, employees have grappled with burnout, feeling undervalued, and struggling with work-life balance.
Is It Really Quitting, Though? Or Just Setting Boundaries?
Here’s where the debate gets interesting. Critics argue “quiet quitting” signals laziness, lack of ambition, and detriment to company culture. They believe employees should be passionate and exceed expectations.
However, proponents see it as a long-overdue correction, a form of self-preservation, establishing healthy boundaries, and reclaiming personal time in a demanding world.
Let’s consider some key points:
- The expectation of “going above and beyond” often justifies unfair workloads and unpaid labor.
- Technology blurs the lines between work and personal life, making it difficult to disconnect.