The Rise of “Quiet Quitting“
Lately, the internet has been abuzz with talk of “quiet quitting.” This seemingly new work trend has sparked countless articles, social media debates, and even some finger-pointing. But is it really a new phenomenon, or are we just giving a catchy name to something many workers have been doing for years?
Enter “quiet quitting,” a term that, despite its name, isn’t actually about quitting at all. It’s more about doing the bare minimum at work, no longer going above and beyond, and prioritizing personal time over work demands.
Is It Quiet Quitting or Setting Boundaries? The Debate
This is where the debate gets interesting. Critics argue that “quiet quitting” is simply a new term for a lack of work ethic, disengagement, and even entitlement. They argue that employees are obligated to give their all during work hours.
However, proponents of setting boundaries see it differently. They argue that “quiet quitting” is about:
- Reclaiming personal time: After years of hustle culture, many individuals are prioritizing their well-being and setting limits on work encroaching on personal time.
- Rejecting unrealistic expectations: In a time when companies may demand more with fewer resources, employees are pushing back against unsustainable workloads.
- Prioritizing mental health: Burnout is a real issue, and “quiet quitting” can be a way for individuals to protect their mental health by setting boundaries.
