Just Relaxed Blog

Tag: Quiet Hiring

Is “Quiet Hiring” the Answer to “Quiet Quitting” or Just Another Buzzword?
The Rise of “Quiet” Workplace Trends

From “quiet quitting” to “quiet firing,” the workplace seems to be embracing a new era of hushed hustle and silent struggles. The latest buzzword to join this party? “Quiet hiring.” But is this just another fleeting trend, or does it signal a deeper shift in how we approach work?

Decoding the “Quiets”: A Quick Recap

Let’s be clear: none of these “quiets” are actually new phenomena. They’ve always existed in some form, but the pandemic and its aftermath have brought them into sharp focus.
- Quiet Quitting: Disengaging from work beyond your job description; doing the bare minimum without explicitly resigning.
- Quiet Firing: Management’s passive-aggressive tactic to push employees towards quitting by neglecting their growth, giving them menial tasks, or excluding them from opportunities.
- Quiet Hiring: Companies filling skills gaps by reshuffling existing employees or hiring for temporary/contract roles instead of committing to permanent positions.
Quiet Hiring the Solution or Just a Symptom?
Proponents of “quiet hiring” argue that it benefits both employers and employees. Companies can save costs and adapt to changing needs quickly, while workers gain opportunities to explore new roles and develop skills.

However, critics see it as a band-aid solution that masks deeper issues:
1. Burnout Risk: Piling on additional responsibilities without proper compensation or recognition can lead to employee burnout and resentment.
2. Lack of Security: The temporary nature of these arrangements can create anxiety and uncertainty for workers seeking stability and long-term career paths.
3. Stunted Growth: Focusing solely on filling immediate needs might prevent companies from investing in long-term talent development and succession planning.
March 11, 2025
Is the Workplace Whispering? Decoding Quiet Quitting, Firing, and Hiring
Is the Workplace Whispering? Decoding Quiet Quitting, Firing, and Hiring

The Quiet Revolution: A New Language of Work

The modern workplace is abuzz with whispers of “quiet quitting,” “quiet firing,” and the latest entrant, “quiet hiring.” These aren’t your typical office gossips but trends reflecting a seismic shift in how we perceive and engage with work. They highlight a growing disconnect between employers and employees, signaling a need to reassess the employer-employee contract.

The Rise of “Quiet” Trends: Understanding the Context

To understand these trends, we need to rewind a bit. The COVID-19 pandemic triggered a global reassessment of priorities. Burnout became rampant, and the traditional workplace structure was turned on its head. Employees, many facing unprecedented stress and uncertainty, started seeking better work-life balance and prioritizing well-being.

Decoding the Trends: Quiet Quitting, Firing, and Hiring
- Quiet Quitting emerged as employees, disillusioned or burnt out, started doing the bare minimum at work. No more going above and beyond—just meeting the basic requirements of their job descriptions.
- Quiet Firing became a counter-trend where employers, instead of having open conversations about performance issues, resorted to tactics like passing over employees for promotions, reducing responsibilities, or creating a generally stifling work environment to nudge them towards quitting.
And now, entering stage left, we have Quiet Hiring. This strategy sees companies filling skills gaps without actually hiring new full-time employees. Think internal transfers, project-based contracts, or upskilling existing employees. It’s a cost-effective solution in times of economic uncertainty, but is it sustainable in the long run?

Analyzing the “Quiet” Phenomena: A Two-Way Street?

While these trends have been painted as different sides of the same coin, the reality is far more nuanced.
- Quiet Quitting can be a symptom of a larger issue – lack of engagement, poor management, or a mismatch in expectations. It’s a cry for help, a way for employees to reclaim some control over their lives.
- Quiet Firing, on the other hand, can be perceived as a cowardly and damaging tactic. It breeds distrust, impacts morale, and ultimately hurts the company culture.
- Quiet Hiring, while seemingly a win-win, can lead to increased workload and pressure on existing employees. If not managed well, it risks replicating the very conditions that lead to quiet quitting in the first place.
The common thread? A lack of open and honest communication.

March 11, 2025
Quiet Quitting, Quiet Firing, and Now Quiet Hiring: Is This the Sound of the Future of Work?

Work
From “Great Resignation” to “Quiet Quitting,” the workplace has become a breeding ground for buzzwords. Each phrase attempts to capture the zeitgeist of employee sentiment and evolving work dynamics. Now, “quiet firing” and “quiet hiring” have joined the lexicon, painting a picture of a workplace where communication seems to be dying a slow, silent death. But are these trends as pervasive as they seem, or are we just hearing whispers amplified by the echo chamber of social media?

The Rise of the “Quiets”: Understanding the Workplace Landscape

Let’s dissect these terms. “Quiet quitting” refers to employees doing the bare minimum, disengaging from going above and beyond. It’s not about shirking responsibilities but sticking firmly within the lines of a job description. “Quiet firing” flips the script, with employers creating a hostile or unsatisfying environment to nudge employees towards quitting, avoiding the messiness of formal termination. And finally, “quiet hiring” sees companies filling roles internally or through contract work, sidestepping traditional hiring processes.

These trends didn’t emerge in a vacuum. The pandemic, with its seismic shifts in work-life balance, brought pre-existing tensions to the forefront. Burnout, lack of recognition, and stagnant wages are nothing new, but the pandemic amplified these issues, pushing employees to reassess their priorities and seek better opportunities.

March 9, 2025