The Rise of “Quiet Quitting”: A New Trend or Age-Old Struggle?
The term “quiet quitting” has taken the internet by storm, sparking debates about work-life balance and employee expectations. But is this phenomenon truly new, or are we simply giving a catchy name to the age-old desire for healthy boundaries between our professional and personal lives?
Despite its name, “quiet quitting” doesn’t involve a dramatic resignation. Instead, it’s about fulfilling work obligations without going above and beyond. Here are some common signs of a “quiet quitter”:
- Sticking strictly to their job description and avoiding extra tasks.
- Clocking out promptly at the end of the workday, resisting the “always-on” mentality.
- Exhibiting less enthusiasm or initiative, appearing mentally disengaged from work.
While some view this as a negative trend driven by laziness or entitlement, others see it as a natural reaction to demanding work environments and a lack of work-life balance.
“Quiet Quitting” vs. Setting Boundaries: Are They Really That Different?
The key question is whether “quiet quitting” is merely a rebranding of setting healthy boundaries. Establishing boundaries involves defining what we are and are not willing to do, both personally and professionally, to protect our time, energy, and well-being.
This is where the lines get blurry. Refusing to answer emails after hours or declining projects outside your job scope can be seen as setting healthy boundaries. However, if “quiet quitting” manifests as apathy, disengagement, and declining work quality, it can harm both the individual and the organization.
